|
Community News Archives Archives of the CSA forum. |
|
Thread Tools | Rating: | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The point here is consistency and credibility. When you implement a policy but opt not to enforce it upon exceptional individuals, the rest of us get mad.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Don't let the door hit ya on the way out!
__________________
I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes, or should I? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Anyway - it's obviously unfair to dismiss all criticism of staff policy as 'soapboxing'. It's an ad hominem argument - even if the intent is questionable, why can't you refute the argument on merit alone? While I agree that quitting is absurd, what is controversial about asking for equal treatment when it comes to the enforcement of staff policy? Personal pardons are an obvious injustice. If the staff want their decisions to resonate with the community, they had damn well better enforce them fairly. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Can't you all just calm down for bit?
Let it settle for day or 2 and see how things turn out and start to roll.
__________________
mijom@swgemu.com | Helpful links SWGEmu is a non-profit, open source community project. |
|
|