TC:NOVA Wipe Poll Results - Page 5

Lamune · #1 04-27-2010, 02:24 PM

Can we still find out who the dupers were so we can throw rocks at them?

Valkyra · #2 04-27-2010, 02:24 PM

Lol.

Just, lol.

khamsinvera · #3 04-27-2010, 02:24 PM

66.36% said YES to a wipe

and yet ...

Bredon_Kin'dragon · #4 04-27-2010, 02:25 PM

Best SWG Live Emulator ever. Just like SOE.

When the Developers ignore the desires of the masses.

Jedi fan boys win again.

-B

kookaburra · #5 04-27-2010, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bredon_Kin'dragon

Best SWG Live Emulator ever. Just like SOE.

This made me LOL irl!

Bulbous · #6 04-27-2010, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by khamsinvera

66.36% said YES to a wipe

And did you not read how a 66.6% majority was needed for a wipe? This was a righteous decision.

GOOD JOB DEVS! Forget this nonsense, and roll on with the OR. Then will we wipe this sandbox and get on with the real work!!!

**Vlada** · #7 04-27-2010, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bulbous

And did you not read how a 66.6% majority was needed for a wipe? This was a righteous decision.

GOOD JOB DEVS! Forget this nonsense, and roll on with the OR. Then will we wipe this sandbox and get on with the real work!!!

Actually Kyle said it should be more than 66%, but since that thread went bye, bye...

Kainzo · #8 04-27-2010, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlada

Actually it was just more than 66%, but since that thread went bye, bye...

Actually, I was on a call at work and refreshed my page before the call, it was just under 66.5% - as I still have the page open with 1980 votes or so.

Joshino · #9 04-27-2010, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlada

Actually it was just more than 66%, but since that thread went bye, bye...

It was around 70%

There was 47% roughly for blue frogs.
24% roughly for straight wipe.

Kainzo · #10 04-27-2010, 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshino

It was around 70%

There was 47% roughly for blue frogs.
24% roughly for straight wipe.

Math! - the bane of life!

http://img689.imageshack.us/i/pollam...foreclose.png/

Rincon · #11 04-27-2010, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlada

Actually Kyle said it should be more than 66%, but since that thread went bye, bye...

Why was Kyle such an active part of the "vote NO" voice anyway? I personally saw several system messages from him, obviously phrased in a way that supported the no vote, and now the roumour of the week being passed around is that he was involved in creating new account to vote no with?

Along with my opinion of getting someone with online community management experience involved, I would also HIGHLY recommend a firm separation of church and state when it comes to people involved in administrating/developing the game, and the player-base. Far bigger games than SWGemu have been destroyed because of bias and involvement from the administrative game. You guys having bias towards players, guilds, opinions, ect will do nothing but alienate the other side and encourage them to move on to something else.

**Vlada** · #12 04-27-2010, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rincon

Why was Kyle such an active part of the "vote NO" voice anyway? I personally saw several system messages from him, obviously phrased in a way that supported the no vote, and now the roumour of the week being passed around is that he was involved in creating new account to vote no with?

Nooooo, my post had nothing to do with Kyle, i responded to someone spreading misinformation. Someone claimed that it was 66.66% needed for the wipe to go through, and since i couldn't quote Kyle (thread was deleted) i just posted that.

This has nothing to do with anyone personal. This is all a abut the SWGEmu team as whole, about their professionalism or lack of it.

safak · #13 04-27-2010, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bulbous

And did you not read how a 66.6% majority was needed for a wipe? This was a righteous decision.

GOOD JOB DEVS! Forget this nonsense, and roll on with the OR. Then will we wipe this sandbox and get on with the real work!!!

i KNEW the 66.6 was going to come into play.
want to see something interesting?

20 seconds before close
http://img689.imageshack.us/i/pollam...foreclose.png/

database error, 20 sec later back up pool closed
http://img191.imageshack.us/i/pollafterclose.png/

just enough votes, all thrown in 3rd option to get it under 66.6 (Which is a statistical imposiblitly btw)

Yhor · #14 04-27-2010, 03:00 PM

Welcome to SOE, the free edition.

Lying, cheating, and generally going back on your word are what drives it.

galena · #15 04-27-2010, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by safak

i KNEW the 66.6 was going to come into play.
want to see something interesting?

20 seconds before close
http://img689.imageshack.us/i/pollam...foreclose.png/

database error, 20 sec later back up pool closed
http://img191.imageshack.us/i/pollafterclose.png/

just enough votes, all thrown in 3rd option to get it under 66.6 (Which is a statistical imposiblitly btw)

Please stop throwing words like statistically impossible out, especially since you a) appear to have little to no grasp of statistics and b) have not shown the "statistics" that show it is impossible.