I know a lot of people are upset about the rubber-banding but some of the posts in this thread sound like an all out
witch hunt.
Without the issue coming to light it would not be getting fixed and gone unchecked would have severely impacted the live server when ready.
In a test center there is a very fine line between exploiting and testing.
If an exploit is found, documented and reported then the person that found it is a great tester and not an exploiter.
What I read in the OP is that it wasn't really a client side speed hack in the end. It was a bug with forcerun3. Knowing that the reset timers on a lot of stuff aren't working properly atm this makes a lot of sense to me.
I am glad to hear that thorough communication allowed all the angles to be revealed.
On another note ...
I can see reasons that the found exploits not be public but can also see reasons that they should.
As an example:
I found a crafting experimentation exploit that would allow for more than amazing results on every experimentation. (Am I a cheater for finding it?)
When I reported it I made the bug report Private thinking best not to advertise. It was promptly made public and assigned. It was also fixed on the next server restart
![Smile](http://www.swgemu.com/forums/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif)
Then there was the backpack / stackable container dup exploit.
I ran into this way back when. Added a note to a newly created bug report.
A few days later I found some more information on it but the bug report was moved to a private one, so i was unable to add another note.
During the next few weeks I kept seeing new bug reports being added and made private for the exact same issue.
My question on this matter is ... Was keeping this kind of issue private worth all the extra work it took to keep it that way? IMO removing backpacks and keeping the exploit public would have been a lot less work.
It benefits us all to have every ounce of data at our disposal if usage of that knowledge is pure and honorable but severely raises the potential of misuse by selfish / greedy people and potentially weak willed people that can't contain themselves.
I don't envy the job of drawing the line between viable testing and gross misuse.
I commend the entire staff for their diligent work.