|
Community News Archives Archives of the CSA forum. |
|
Thread Tools | Rating: | Display Modes |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Taking into account for all of the dramafests and "issues", and accepting that the decisions made up to this point, all combined and played out over the years have come to this moment, this whole argument of a modification of a rule for exploiters: What does the community think? What does the community feel is the appropriate course of action? Is there a way we can appease both the community and the STAFF? So far: What does the community think? 50/50 or 40/60 split over "good idea to involve exploiters in testing" vs "exploiters should never be dealt with" What does the community feel is the appropriate course of action? This is where we have not had as much input from the community. Enough flaming, +1ing, and counterpointing. What would you have done were you in STAFF's position? Is there a way we can appease both the community and STAFF? I certainly think so. Maybe the community wants Ashur perma-banned, but allow for the exploitation team. Maybe the community will be okay with whatever STAFF decides. All I know is, we need more constructive input from you guys if we are going to have this discussion. If you feel in anyway that you would be persecuted for your opinions, feel free to PM me or ANY OTHER Blue Name here at the SWGEmu Forums, although I certainly hope that sort of atmosphere would not come to our community. Please work with us in a constructive and mature manner, I'm sure we will all be able to come to a reasonable compromise. Thanks.
__________________
Learning Game Master/Event Coordinator -sɯnɹoɟ ɹǝǝuıƃuǝ pıoɹp | sɯnɹoɟ ʇɹoddns nɯǝƃʍs | ɯoɔ˙nɯǝƃʍs@ƃuıuɹɐǝן- SWGEmu is a non-profit, open source community project. |
|
|