|
Which is more harmful to the Emu community?
1. Banning known exploiters/hackers/griefers who "might" be able to help find other exploits/hacks.
2. A small group of Devs unbanning known exploiters/hackers/griefers after the entire Dev team voted to ban them, undermining the Dev team as a whole. Causing several members of the Dev team to either quit the project, or consider quitting the project.
It feels to me like the Dev team took the time to debate and decide upon a solution that would benefit the Emu community as a whole, but then a small group of the team made a snap decision to reverse this solution without discussing it with the rest of the Dev team.
|
10-19-2009, 12:24 PM
Threaded Mode