SWGEmu Old Forums Archive  

Go Back   SWGEmu Old Forums Archive > Announcements > Community News > Community News Archives

Notices

Community News Archives Archives of the CSA forum.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 18 votes, 1.22 average. Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-27-2010, 05:15 PM
Vlock Vlock is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,376
not happy about it. so much QQ about the wipe. I cant wait until it legitimately comes and all those duped items and credits come to a close.

Well, not that it matters, I wont be playing until the TC is wiped. Ill of course keep an eye on the progress here though.
__________________
  #2  
Old 04-27-2010, 05:17 PM
Whiskey37 Whiskey37 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 8
****! So there are no blue frogs to ****?
  #3  
Old 04-27-2010, 05:20 PM
trunck trunck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 45
same ol' game, same ol' bull****
__________________
  #4  
Old 04-27-2010, 05:21 PM
Massimiliano Massimiliano is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by trunck View Post
same ol' game, same ol' bull****
Best post of the thread, few words for a sad reality.
  #5  
Old 04-27-2010, 05:21 PM
BlazeHoliday BlazeHoliday is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: A galaxy called Scylla!
Posts: 211
wow, way to piss off the majority.

should of just said we are wiping and will give you guys frogs for the first two weeks

/endthread

SOE much?
__________________

  #6  
Old 04-27-2010, 05:24 PM
Vlock Vlock is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,376
many people are claiming the staff lack of professionalism by ignoring the voice of the majority.

are we surprised how this turned out? Of course a small percentage doesnt want their crap wiped even though it is inevitable in the future anyway, yet again, SOMEONE catered to the crying of the minority rather than the voice of the majority. sound familiar?
__________________
  #7  
Old 04-27-2010, 05:25 PM
BlazeHoliday BlazeHoliday is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: A galaxy called Scylla!
Posts: 211
I also like how there is definately a wipe needed due to not only exploiters but other reasons and it's totally being over looked.

It's like a kid brings drugs to school and the school principal takes a vote to see if the kid should be expelled. Vast majority say yes a fraction say no and we have a debate and next thing ya know..... CU... NGE... QQers!
__________________

  #8  
Old 04-27-2010, 05:27 PM
Z Ray Z Ray is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 60
This isn't even really about to wipe or not wipe. It's the fact they jerked the community around. I don't play the TC anyways, mostly due to the minoirty that voted no.
__________________
  #9  
Old 04-27-2010, 05:29 PM
rekoil rekoil is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 305
thanks for the update
__________________

Intrepid
  #10  
Old 04-27-2010, 05:30 PM
Letesh Letesh is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 18
QQ more people. The devs have their reasons for not wiping. Accept it and get back to playing or leave...
  #11  
Old 04-27-2010, 05:30 PM
Ekowraith Ekowraith is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Disappearing in the Anchorhead basement
Posts: 814
The issue isn't gratitude here. This decision was senseless, aggressively unfair, damaging to the integrity of the community, and rewarding of bad behavior.

To the "don't complain, it's free" crowd: would you complain if a developer banned you because he disagreed with you politically? Your same principles would apply: you are not paying for SWGEmu, and you do not have a right to it. But at the end of the day, unfair treatment is unfair treatment. People seem to be content to overlook this when it favors them.
  #12  
Old 04-27-2010, 05:34 PM
Vlock Vlock is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekowraith View Post
The issue isn't gratitude here. This decision was senseless, aggressively unfair, damaging to the integrity of the community, and rewarding of bad behavior.

To the "don't complain, it's free" crowd: would you complain if a developer banned you because he disagreed with you politically? Your same principles would apply: you are not paying for SWGEmu, and you do not have a right to it. But at the end of the day, unfair treatment is unfair treatment. People seem to be content to overlook this when it favors them.
I whole heartedly must agree with eko's statement.
__________________
  #13  
Old 04-27-2010, 05:36 PM
Duchess Duchess is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekowraith View Post
The issue isn't gratitude here. This decision was senseless, aggressively unfair, damaging to the integrity of the community, and rewarding of bad behavior.

To the "don't complain, it's free" crowd: would you complain if a developer banned you because he disagreed with you politically? Your same principles would apply: you are not paying for SWGEmu, and you do not have a right to it. But at the end of the day, unfair treatment is unfair treatment. People seem to be content to overlook this when it favors them.
I've been banned from Darkfall just because I'm on the same router as my boyfriend and he got himself banned from the forum. I told them and they didn't believe me so I just left. That's it. I didn't mind.
__________________

Norma- Battle Master.
Shimale- MID.
Duchess- A big hairy wookiee.
  #14  
Old 04-27-2010, 05:38 PM
Kraschman Kraschman is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekowraith View Post
The issue isn't gratitude here. This decision was senseless, aggressively unfair, damaging to the integrity of the community, and rewarding of bad behavior.

To the "don't complain, it's free" crowd: would you complain if a developer banned you because he disagreed with you politically? Your same principles would apply: you are not paying for SWGEmu, and you do not have a right to it. But at the end of the day, unfair treatment is unfair treatment. People seem to be content to overlook this when it favors them.
What precisely is unfair about this treatment?
  • The fact we get to play in their sandbox?
  • The fact they even solicited our opinion despite not needing to?
  • The fact they never promised they would wipe the server?
  • The fact they decided not to wipe based on several issues including possible vote fixing?
Personally, I'm not seeing the unfair part. And also for the record, none of my characters have any gear that is remotely uber, or more than 5k credits. So I'm no duper.
  #15  
Old 04-27-2010, 05:43 PM
Ekowraith Ekowraith is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Disappearing in the Anchorhead basement
Posts: 814
  • That the staff closed the poll and erred on the side of the minority. If it were at all in doubt, why not make the choice that most people favored?
  • That the justifications for closing the poll rewarded the exact bad behavior it claimed to punish. ("No" voters were more likely to have dupe votes because dupers had something to gain by voting no.)
  • That staff very likely changed the poll by adding and removing votes to lessen the severity of their minority-pandering decision.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Contents Copyright © 2004-2010, SWGEmu.